It is widely acknowledged that the common man is harmed by a group's ideology. Personal opinions may differ from those of the group on occasion. Many fringe ideologies compel ordinary people to act in the group's best interests while also robbing them of their freedoms.

Many people believe that the average man suffers from the heat of group ideology. This has been obvious since the dawn of time. For example, if there is a conflict between countries, which is usually based on ideology, the ordinary people are disproportionately affected. People are sometimes killed in wars and fights as a result of this disparity. Regardless of a person's unwillingness to follow the organization, he must be a victim of the group's philosophy.

Furthermore, wars based on conflicting ideologies rob a person of their autonomy. It is increasingly typical to discover a small group of extremists killing innocent people in the name of religion in various countries. People living in these infiltrated places are forced to act in accordance with these people's fringe views, even if it means killing a regular man who has nothing to do with it. As a result, it's impossible to refute this argument in favor of rubric.

In a word, wars of ideas force ordinary people to participate against their choice while also robbing them of their freedom. The general public will now have to pay a high price for a group's ideas. This trend is unlikely to change as long as groups act in their own best interests.