Summarize Written Text

Summarize Written Text

Free CELPIP Writing Task 2 Samples Practice Test Responding to Survey Questions on Environment Survey

Read the following information.

Choose the option that you prefer. Why do you prefer your choice? Explain the reasons for your choice. Write about 150-200 words.

Your city's Environment protection department is conducting a survey to bring in revolutionary changes  in the  transport system. The department  has sent out an opinion survey to see what residents feel about the given options

Option A: Governments should spend money on the development of public transportation systems.

Option B: It is better to spend money on the development of electric and other types of cars that may cause less pollution.

Option A: Governments should spend money on the development of public transportation systems.

Option A from the city's Environment Protection Department suggests governments invest in public transit to create a more sustainable and environmentally friendly transport system. Governments may reduce traffic, pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions by investing in public transit.

Public transit is also cheaper and easier for people without cars or limited mobility. This can enhance social fairness and eliminate car ownership-related socioeconomic inequities.

Yet, public transportation systems demand substantial financial and political investment. It may take decades to construct the infrastructure needed for an effective public transit system, and drivers may oppose.

Moreover, public transportation systems must be convenient, reliable, and safe for users. These may include accessibility, frequency, and security.

In conclusion, investing in public transportation networks has environmental, social, and economic benefits, but it also has financial, political, and practical drawbacks.

Governments must collaborate with the community to design and operate public transportation networks that fulfill everyone's needs and promote a sustainable and equitable future.

Option B: It is better to spend money on the development of electric and other types of cars that may cause less pollution.

The city's environment protection department's option B of investing in electric and other low-emission cars is a way to reduce transportation's environmental impact.

Electric and other low-emission vehicles help reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, improving health and the environment.

It's crucial to remember that electric and other low-emission vehicles may not be affordable for everyone, especially low-income people. Electric automobiles require rare metals and fossil fuels for manufacturing and transportation, thus they still have an environmental impact.

An overreliance on personal vehicles can also cause traffic congestion, which is bad for the environment and city life.

In conclusion, electric and other low-emission vehicles can reduce transportation's environmental impact, but they also affect accessibility, affordability, and urban planning.

Public transportation, bike lanes, and other alternative means of transportation can assist develop a sustainable and equitable transportation system.

Governments and communities must collaborate to find and implement solutions that meet all requirements and promote a sustainable future.

PTE Academic

PTE Academic was launched in 2009 by Pearson Language Tests.